The circumstances surrounding our recent adoption compared to our first adoption (and more specifically, the
birthmothers of our children in each case) are so vastly different that it is
like comparing apples to oranges.
I suppose that open adoption in any case can be tricky to navigate but in cases of foster adoption if your children’s first parents have severe mental illness, criminal records, ties to drugs and gangs, or a history of neglecting, endangering, or abandoning their children it doesn’t exactly make you want to embrace continued contact with them with open arms. The safety and privacy of your children and family trump all else.
I suppose that open adoption in any case can be tricky to navigate but in cases of foster adoption if your children’s first parents have severe mental illness, criminal records, ties to drugs and gangs, or a history of neglecting, endangering, or abandoning their children it doesn’t exactly make you want to embrace continued contact with them with open arms. The safety and privacy of your children and family trump all else.
However, despite the fact that Jack
and Jill’s first mother is ____________ (fill in the blank): a drug addict or
mentally ill or homeless or not capable of parenting [she is not all of those things, by the way, but those are some very
common conditions of the parents of children we’ve fostered, to use as examples]
doesn’t negate her place as first mother in their lives nor do such
unsavory facts or labels negate the role or influence- be it good or bad- that she
or any of the parents of the children we’ve ever fostered have on their
children. Not acknowledging their
birthmother would not only be disrespectful to her but dishonest as well- it would
be hiding part of our children’s story, even if that story did not start out
under the best of circumstances.
After Jack and Jill’s birthmother
relinquished her parental rights two months ago DCFS allowed her one final
“goodbye visit” with her children at the DCFS Office. I was grateful that the caseworker
supervising the visit took the time to record the visit and made copies for us
and for her.
Although we are under no legal
obligation whatsoever to keep in contact with Jack and Jill’s first mother, we
have decided to let her have continued, yet limited, contact with Jack and Jill
based on what is in their best interest. Herein
lies the dilemma: it’s really not in their best interest (at this point in
time, at least) for them to have continued contact with her. And yet, we know that their first mother is
having a hard time losing two children.
Because of this, between the time of her “official” goodbye visit and
the adoption we all met at a third-party location (that sounds so secretive-
but it was just a McDonalds) where she visited with Jack and Jill for an
hour. We took lots of pictures and it
was amusing to see Jack interact with his baby brother whom the children have
met at least once before at one of their supervised visits where their birth
grandma was able to lend a hand. Jack has
always had a gentle nature and couldn’t give the baby enough hugs. Jill, however, didn’t want to share any attention
so she was totally ignoring the baby and doing her own thing.
At the end of the visit after
watching their mother interact with the kids it was just confirmed to my husband
and I what we already suspected: Although
it was fun for Jack to see the baby, the visit wasn’t so much for our children’s
benefit as it was for their first mom’s sake.
In truth, Jill much preferred to have
“Daddy” chase her around and play with her each time her birthmother tried to
pick her up and hold her.
So that’s where we’re at with
continued contact at this point in time.
Over the past several weeks we’ve been trying to set up some boundaries between
our children’s first mother and ourselves which can be tricky and somewhat
awkward. The hardest part for us has
been trying to find a balance between being sensitive to her loss and feelings
while simultaneously helping her to understand that she is no longer their
parent and because of that, Jack and Jill need some time (and space) to
bond with us as their full-time parents.
Not only would such space give
Jack and Jill a better sense of permanency but hopefully such space will give
us some breathing room as foster parents coming to the close of a year and a
half long emotionally exhausting case which has been full of weekly required
visits. We also think that such space
and temporary separation, although understandably hard on her, would be
beneficial for their first mom and her healing.
At this point so close after relinquishment and adoption any personal
contact she has with Jack and Jill will just make things harder.
One option I’m considering to
help Jack and Jill differentiate between their first mother and myself, now
that I am their official mom and she no longer is, is to refer to her as Mama
________ (her first name). That way we
still both retain the “mother” status but there is a difference for them between
“the woman who used to be my mother” (somewhat less formal by attaching her
first name in back of “Mama”) and “my current mother” (simply “Mama”).
As for Jack and Jill’s
birthfather, he hasn’t had any contact with them since last summer and they
thus haven’t been faced with the dilemma of having to differentiate between two
daddies. I envy my husband for not
having to deal with any of that parenting drama/competition because sometimes
it’s hard to share such a crucial role- especially when most parents don’t have
to share their child with another mom or dad when they welcome a child into
their family (step-parenting is certainly one exception.)
Although Jack and Jill’s birthfather expressed the desire to relinquish his parental rights last year he never actually showed up to any of the court hearings to officially do so and therefore, at the recent pre-trial hearing where Jack and Jill’s mother relinquished her rights, their birthfather’s rights were officially terminated in his absence after having been given advanced notice.
Although Jack and Jill’s birthfather expressed the desire to relinquish his parental rights last year he never actually showed up to any of the court hearings to officially do so and therefore, at the recent pre-trial hearing where Jack and Jill’s mother relinquished her rights, their birthfather’s rights were officially terminated in his absence after having been given advanced notice.
No comments:
Post a Comment