The purpose of foster care is
family preservation so it shouldn’t be too surprising that half of the children
we’ve fostered have been transferred from our care to the temporary or
permanent care of their relatives. This
was the case with our last placement.
Supposedly there is a 90 day
timeframe from the time a child comes into protective custody for relatives to
come forward and express an interest in having the child placed in their
home. I’ve learned to look at the 90 day
timeframe not so much as a statute,
but as a suggestion; In other words, say a child has spent almost a year in
their foster home and appears to safe, loved, and happily adjusted, but Uncle
Bob- who lives ten states away and who’s never even met the child- comes out of
the woodwork and decides he’d like the child placed with his family. Who gets preference for placement of the
child – the foster family or Uncle Bob? In foster care, sometimes blood is thicker
than what is in the child’s best interest so by law Uncle Bob as a relative
gets preference over a non-related caregiver for placement of the child. However, as I mentioned in my last update,
just because a relative is willing to take a child doesn’t necessarily mean
they’ll be approved by the state to do so.
Sometimes we feel good about where
our foster children have ended up and other times- not so much. Fortunately, after meeting the relatives who
would become Ty and Ian’s new kinship placement last week, I felt a sense of
relief rather than worry. I feel like
these relatives aren’t just taking the boys out of obligation, but because they
have a deep concern for their welfare. In fact, these relatives had to make
significant sacrifices on their part to take the boys which is why the approval
process took so long.
I’m glad that the boys will have
a mother figure and a father figure (or in this case a grandmother and
grandfather figure) in their lives and although technically these grandparents
are only grandparents to one of the boys [since they’re half-brothers] they are
not strangers to either boys and they treat both boys as if they were their
grandsons.
When Ian’s grandfather saw me for
the first time last week he walked up to me with tears in his eyes, embraced
me, and said, “Thank You.” over and over. I wasn’t expecting that. The grandma explained that they had not seen
the boys in over six months and were obviously quite worried about their
well-being. I was surprised when they
asked me how long the boys had been in my care, but then again, their son has
been the one parent in this case who hasn’t even bothered to set up visits with
his son, so maybe keeping his parents updated on their grandchild’s well-being
isn’t at the top of his priority list.
I imagine that the trickiest part
about kinship placements is that as with all foster placements, the main
concern is the children’s safety, but how
can keeping the children out of contact with their parents when they’re living
with relatives realistically be enforced?
I see this as the biggest problem with this particular kinship
placement. Although the boy’s caseworker
could technically stop by their new foster home anytime she wanted to, there is no
way that she has the time to constantly “check up” like that. The caseworker is aware of this as are the
relatives.
When I try to see things from the kinship placement’s point of view it must be difficult to have to say to one’s son (or brother or sister or cousin-whatever the case may be), “You can’t come near your kids except for your weekly court-ordered supervised visit- otherwise we both could get into trouble.” And by “trouble” I mean being charged with failure to protect the children in care and risk having the children moved to another home. Certainly issues of divided loyalties and contentions would arise.
When I try to see things from the kinship placement’s point of view it must be difficult to have to say to one’s son (or brother or sister or cousin-whatever the case may be), “You can’t come near your kids except for your weekly court-ordered supervised visit- otherwise we both could get into trouble.” And by “trouble” I mean being charged with failure to protect the children in care and risk having the children moved to another home. Certainly issues of divided loyalties and contentions would arise.
Aside from the fact that I feel
confident the boys will be safe and cared for, the other good news is that the
relatives, who live in a neighboring town, have invited us to keep in contact
with the boys. I expressed my sincerest appreciation for allowing us to keep in
contact, but I also explained, as I’ve had to before, that it would probably be
best for the boy’s sake to wait a couple of months till they settle into their
new environment before doing so.
No comments:
Post a Comment