The following is an excerpt from a paper I did a couple of months ago. Because the topic is very pertinent to issues in fostering and adoption and because the assignment specifically asked that I share how the understanding of the concept or theories related to my personal experiences AND since I happen to have a blog called Adoption & Foster Care: My Personal Experiences, I now have new material to share on my neglected blog. How convenient!
Incidentally, I was delighted to learn about the Skeels study mentioned in the second paragraph* because I was not familiar with it until I had finished my reading. Upon further research, I learned that the women caregivers of the previously neglected infants functioned at the developmental levels of about six or seven years old.
Incidentally, I was delighted to learn about the Skeels study mentioned in the second paragraph* because I was not familiar with it until I had finished my reading. Upon further research, I learned that the women caregivers of the previously neglected infants functioned at the developmental levels of about six or seven years old.
Competency
#1- Identify and describe how loss of a
caregiver affects a child after he or she has developed an attachment to that caregiver.
There were five or six attachment studies cited
in Chapter 6, so I will just pick two of them which explain how the loss of a
caregiver affects a child. In 1980, John Bowlby, the founder of
Attachment Theory, examined adolescents who had spent their infancy and
childhood in institutions or foster care, often with several moves. These adolescents displayed a lack of
empathy and affection for others. Because they were not shown love
consistently as babies, they were unable to model showing love for others. Further research on the subject (Trout,
1995). came to the same conclusion: many children who fail to form attachments
as infants grow up to show lack of empathy and even delinquent
behavior.
*The good news is
that another study (Skeels, 1936) showed that the effects of early deprivation
and lack of attachment can be reversed with care at a later age. In 1936, two baby girls (13 and 16 months
old) from neglectful families were admitted to an overcrowded Iowa orphanage. Because these babies only functioned at about
the level of a 6 or 7 month old, they were placed in a home for women with
“retardation.” Six months later the baby
girls were lively, alert and functioning on much higher levels than they had
been because the women in the home had provided these girls with plenty of
stimulation and interaction.
How does understanding this competency apply
to my own personal development?
I’ve been a foster parent for over ten years now and about a third of my
foster children have been babies and toddlers- who seem to be the most vulnerable to the
effects of being separated from their primary caregivers. Even though I’m a very nurturing caregiver
and the babies and children I foster are in a safer environment than they were
before being removed, I obviously worry about how these babies and children are
going to adjust to being removed from, in some instances, the only caretaker
they have ever known, and in a few cases, from moving to another foster home
and being placed with me- a total stranger! Fortunately, babies in foster care get more supervised
weekly visits with their families than older foster children do, so that helps somewhat,
not only for the child but for the child’s birth family as well.
I tend to worry even MORE when these babies or children have been in my
care for 6-11 months, have clearly formed an attachment to me and my family
(referring to me as “mom” in many cases) and then are sent back to live with
their family or relatives whom they may or may not know. How is this separation from me as their
full-time primary caregiver for several months, going to affect them?!
Social workers need to be aware of the reasons behind attachment problems in both young children and
adults. “Research suggests that the
quality of a child’s attachment with a primary caregiver is an excellent
predictor of later functioning (Ciccheti & Wagner, 1990).”- p. 268, Ashford
text. Furthermore, the table in the text
on page 269, “Exhibit 6.8- Assessing attachment problems in young children,”
provides an overview of signs of attachment disorders broken down by behaviors which could be a very helpful assessment
tool for social workers in recognizing attachment issues.
Research also shows that children who are
separated from primary caregivers but are able to remain with a sibling or
other family member, adapt more easily to the separation. (Bremmer, 1998).-
page 273, Ashford text. This is crucial
for child welfare workers and policy makers to understand so that they can keep
siblings together as much as possible in foster care and adoption cases.
1 comment:
I love this one! There is not enough consideration for the added trauma of additional removals.
In addition, the realization that's attachment is so critical should make it clear how dangerous neglect is. The entire system functions as though neglect is "not as big oo a deal". In reality, neglect (especially during the early years when attachment is formed) is often More damaging than abuse. This needs to be recognized by workers and judges.
Post a Comment